One path is suggested by Stanford University’s provost, Jenny S. Which one most colleges will take is very much an open question. But in what direction will colleges move? Two very different options are on the table. Given those intense pressures, and the widespread unhappiness with how colleges have conducted themselves over the past several weeks, it would be remarkable if colleges did not embark on some significant policy reforms in the near future. The hearing did not go well even the White House rebuked the college presidents for being soft on genocide. On Tuesday the House Committee on Education and the Workforce put the presidents of Harvard, the University of Pennsylvania, and MIT on the hot seat, interrogating them about their handling of antisemitism on campus. Media figures, activist groups, and politicians have weighed in. Donors have announced that they will not continue to support colleges. Prospective employers have warned students that their speech on campus might have consequences later. Instructors have been investigated and suspended for political speech, and student groups have been penalized.Īll of that has occurred under heightened outside scrutiny. Protests have sometimes led to physical confrontations, and have spilled over into spaces where such expressive activity is normally excluded. The rhetoric accompanying student protests has been unusually heated and, to many, threatening. Unlike many controversies that flare up and then fade away, the war has fueled nearly continuous agitation on campus. College leaders have come under fire for statements that they have issued, or failed to issue some presidents have made multiple attempts and still failed to appease their critics. The Israel-Hamas war has put colleges’ efforts to balance their commitments to free speech and diversity under the microscope.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |